I’ve seen a few ramblings about the Georgia Tech fight song over the last few weeks. I’m not really into sports. I know the fight song isn’t solely a sports thing but that’s what I tend to associate it with. I didn’t go to a game for nearly a year after i got to Tech, but when I did one thing I noticed was the fight song.
People will say it’s stupid. Maybe it is old and outdated but who cares? I care, and so should you.This is the Institutes main fight song. It represents who we are, and its tarnished by a blatantly sexist statement,
Oh, if I had a daughter, sir, I’d dress her in white and gold,
and put her on the campus to cheer the brave and bold
It’s small and it’s subtle, but it is what it is. Your daughter isn’t an engineer–that level of honor is left for your son. Your daughters just there to cheer him on.
It’s important to identify sexism to help eliminate it. It is subtle, but it’s there none the less. Allowing it stay only continues to sanitize people to the problem where they think a few small things don’t matter. But they do. They influence how we are perceived by others and ourselves.
I get it’s tradition, but tradition is a terrible excuse to continue doing something shitty. It was made in 1908, back before women were allowed in to Tech, so it shouldn’t be that surprising that it has sexist undertones.
Its demeaning to women. Keeping it the way it is not only reinforces this type of mindset by encourages it. We need to stand up and say this is unacceptable. Luckily, things may be changing.
Georgia Tech sent a message to it’s students earlier today talking about just that. It read as follows,
It has come to the attention of the Student Government Association that a proposed change to the Institute’s main fight song, I’m A Ramblin Wreck from Georgia Tech, has stirred up many conversations and discussion over the possibility of a change and a possible underlying issue that spurred the proposal for change. This change was not introduced by a member of the student body however such changes, should they happen, have to be done at the request of the students. The link below is to a poll to gauge the opinion of the student body as to how we should move forward.
So things may actually change all depending on this one poll. Here’s a snapshot of the poll.
This is great–well, not really. It’s definitely a step in the right direction, but I don’t think it should be left in the hands of the students. Universities don’t let fraternities, sororities, or other groups have free rein. Racism and sexism is serious problem that the the University rightly won’t tolerate. I’d expect the university to be even stricter when comes to something like this that doesn’t just represent one group but rather the entire student body and the university itself. Of course they don’t, and it’s appalling in my opinion.
But it is the way it is. We have to work with the hand we’re dealt. That’s why I urge you to go and vote in the poll. Vote to fix this embarrassing problem.
Okay, you may or may not know that I have been doing observational research on Helheim Glacier. That’s coming to a close and I’m moving on to studying Europa. GA Tech has this program called PURA where you could get funding for doing research for a semester. My professor suggested I apply, and I did. I submitted it yesterday, so I haven’t heard back about it yet. I figured I could make another blog post, after long last, of what I wrote. It isn’t too technical, and I think it should be pretty easy to follow. Plus, I’ll threw in pretty pictures. so….
The Effect of Existing Geologic Features on the Formation of Europa’s Chaotic Terrains
Related Work and Background Information:
Icy satellites are of particular interest to planetary scientists with their potential to harbor life. Where there is water, there is likely life. Enceladus has been considered a good candidate for life. It is significantly smaller than Earth and was believed to only have a small localized ocean near its Southern pole. It wasn’t until recently that we discovered these seas actually spanned the entire moon in the form of a global ocean (Thomas et al., 2016). This discovery has profound implications and raises many interesting questions. Except, these questions aren’t new. The Galilean moon of Jupiter, Europa, has long been suspected to have a global ocean (Cassen et al., 1979; Squyres et al., 1983; Carr et al., 1998; Kivelson et al., 2000). It has a radius 6 times larger than Enceladus, and its surface is arguably far more interesting.
For example, Enceladus lacks Europa’s chaos terrains. While there is contention as to what exactly classifies as chaotic terrain, these are regions of lumpy, disrupted matrix material formed from the preexisting surface by an endogenic process (Collins and Nimmo, 2009; Figueredo and Greeley, 2004). Greeley et al. (200) subdivided the chaos terrains to help distinguish between each region. “Platy chaos material” is where preexisting terrain is still observable only moved around like puzzle pieces. “Knobby chaos material” are regions of irregular shapes that are elevated above the surrounding matrix. Later, Figueredo and Greeley (2004) further defined these areas as “elevated” versus “subdued.” They are complex yet fascinating because they indicate that Europa may have what it takes for life to thrive (Kereszturi and Keszthelyi, 2013). These regions may be evidence of subsurface activity facilitating mixing with the surface, and previous attempts have been made to model the formation of these but have been deemed unsatisfactory (Collins and Nimmo, 2009). Recent findings support the hypothesis that these terrains may arise from subsurface water lenses that form underneath the surface, between the deeper ice and the upper 3 km of the ice, facilitating ice-water interactions and giving rise to the distinct morphologies of chaos (Schmidt et al., 2011). This and previous models provide a process that explains some observations of chaos terrains. We hypothesize that the geology that exists before the formation of a water lens controls what the eventual chaos terrain morphology will be.
Overview of proposed work:
The purpose of this research is to study the effect of the existing geologic terrains on the formation of chaotic regions. Europa’s surface is full of different geologic features. In addition to the chaotic terrains it has craters, planes, bands, and ridges (Figueredo and Greeley, 2004). Each of these features are created through various means, but our interest is in their effect on the region after the formation of a subsurface lens because we suspect these are the process by which these chaos terrains are formed. We will use archival image data from Galileo spacecraft of Europa to analyze each of the chaotic terrains on Europa to understand the underlying features and how they reached their current state.
Methods and techniques to be used:
For the past nine months, I have worked with Dr. Britney Schmidt (faculty in EAS) and Dr. Catherine Walker (postdoctoral fellow) as I studied changes to Helheim Glacier in Greenland. The study included tracking calving events, ice bergs and the terminus position, but it began by analyzing the crevasses in the glacier for a particular year. These were traced creating intricate maps of the crevasses in the ice. Seven Maps for years between 2001 to 2014 were created and compared.
The same general approach will be used to study Europa. First, a chaos terrain is chosen from the available image data set. Then the general features in the chaotic region and surrounding it will be mapped and traced. This goes beyond just tracing fractures in the ice. This includes any identifiable features such as ridges, planes, bands, or distinct matrix material that stands out from its surroundings with its own features. These features are separated out into layers to consider possible deformations or dislocations that may have caused these features to become dislodged or altered in place as the liquid lens forms below the surrounding area. Lastly, we will consider what is known about the composition and structure of the ice and the influence it would have on the dynamics that have led to these changes.
All of these observations will allow us to form a set of initial conditions to model from using previously postulated processes for the formation of chaotic regions. Then we compare these results to reality to see if these initial conditions explain why chaos terrains look so different if they experience the same or similar processes during their formation.
Objectives and goals for the semester project:
Identify and Retrieve Cataloged Images for Chaos Terrains
Separate by Chaos Terrain Type (platy chaos material/ knobby chaos material)
· Priority on Platy Chaos Material
Begin study on Conamara Chaos Terrain
· Identify features (ridges, planes, bands, etc.) in chaos and surrounding terrain
· Relate chaos terrain features to surrounding terrain features
· Identify potential orientations and structure of the original landscape
o Consider path traveled if there is enough information in the features
Repeat this process for three to four more chaos terrains (dependent on time)
Predict how these initial terrain structures would deform using the previously proposed models for chaos terrain creation
Compare model results with actual to identify the model reliability
Relation of any past research:
While working on Helheim, I studied the crevasses. I also studied the change in the terminus position over the last decade and tracked iceberg creation and motion down the glacier fjord. I studied the atmospheric conditions and compared it with the glacier data to analysis the impact it had on the glacier flow and calving rate. I’m in the process of concluding my work on the Helheim Glacier. I’ve submitted a poster to International Glaciological Society and an abstract to American Geophysical Union. In December, I’ll be presenting my work at the American Geophysical Union conference. I’m in the process of finalizing a paper to submit for publication by the end of October.
Carr, M. H., Belton, M. J., Chapman, C. R., Davies, M. E., Geissler, P., Greenberg, R., … Veverka, J. (1998). Evidence for a subsurface ocean on Europa. Nature, 391, 363–365. http://doi.org/10.1038/34857
Cassen, P., Reynolds, R. T., & Field, M. (1979). • a • Qr f (• present, 6(9), 731–734.
Greeley, R., Figueredo, P. H., Williams, D. a., Chuang, F. C., Klemaszewski, J. E., Kadel, S. D., … Tanaka, K. L. (2000). Geologic mapping of Europa. Journal of Geophysical Research, 105(E9), 22559. http://doi.org/10.1029/1999JE001173
Kereszturi, A., & Keszthelyi, Z. (2013). Astrobiological implications of chaos terrains on Europa to help targeting future missions. Planetary and Space Science, 77, 74–90. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2012.08.028
Kivelson, M. G., Khurana, K. K., Russell, C. T., Volwerk, M., Walker, R. J., & Zimmer, C. (2000). Galileo magnetometer measurements: a stronger case for a subsurface ocean at Europa. Science (New York, N.Y.), 289(5483), 1340–1343. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5483.1340
Schmidt, B. E., Blankenship, D. D., Patterson, G. W., & Schenk, P. M. (2011). Active formation of “chaos terrain” over shallow subsurface water on Europa. Nature, 479(7374), 502–5. http://doi.org/10.1038/nature10608
Squyres, S. W., Reynolds, R. T., Cassen, P. M., & Peale, S. J. (1983). Liquid water and active resurfacing on Europa. Nature, 301(5897), 225–226. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/301225a0